On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 11:49 PM Carlos O'Donell <carlos(a)systemhalted.org>
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 4:04 PM Frank Ch. Eigler
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 09:54:11PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > Agreed. Also note that the mailing list description is:
> > The GNU Assembly public discussion list
> > The GNU Assembly <https://gnu.tools/>
is a group of GNU project
> > members who transparently and collectively produce technical and
> > organizational recommendations for GNU packages following the GNU
> > Social Contract <https://wiki.gnu.tools/gnu:social-contract>
> > So endorsement of the GNU Social Contract is a given for members of
> > this list.
> Is the intent to interpret a discussion-list membership as equivalent
> to gnu assembly membership, or as an endorsal of position letters
> speaking on behalf of the members?
This is exactly what we are discussing right now. Do you have an
opinion on the topic?
I don't understand the "or" statement in your question though, could
you expand on that more?
I believe there are 3 members on this list (yourself, Florian, and
Jason) which were not asked to endorse the Social Contract before
joining the list.
I endorse it, though talking about the GNU "system" seems a bit
obsolete at this point.