Re: New Assembly Members

On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 4:04 PM Frank Ch. Eigler <fche(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 09:54:11PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > Agreed. Also note that the mailing list description is: > > > > The GNU Assembly public discussion list > > > > The GNU Assembly <https://gnu.tools/> is a group of GNU project > > members who transparently and collectively produce technical and > > organizational recommendations for GNU packages following the GNU > > Social Contract <https://wiki.gnu.tools/gnu:social-contract> > > > > So endorsement of the GNU Social Contract is a given for members of > > this list. > > Is the intent to interpret a discussion-list membership as equivalent > to gnu assembly membership, or as an endorsal of position letters > speaking on behalf of the members? This is exactly what we are discussing right now. Do you have an opinion on the topic? I don't understand the "or" statement in your question though, could you expand on that more? I believe there are 3 members on this list (yourself, Florian, and Jason) which were not asked to endorse the Social Contract before joining the list.