3:49 a.m.
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 4:04 PM Frank Ch. Eigler <fche(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi -
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 09:54:11PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Agreed. Also note that the mailing list description is:
>
> The GNU Assembly public discussion list
>
> The GNU Assembly <https://gnu.tools/> is a group of GNU project
> members who transparently and collectively produce technical and
> organizational recommendations for GNU packages following the GNU
> Social Contract <https://wiki.gnu.tools/gnu:social-contract>
>
> So endorsement of the GNU Social Contract is a given for members of
> this list.
Is the intent to interpret a discussion-list membership as equivalent
to gnu assembly membership, or as an endorsal of position letters
speaking on behalf of the members?
This is exactly what we are discussing right now. Do you have an
opinion on the topic?
I don't understand the "or" statement in your question though, could
you expand on that more?
I believe there are 3 members on this list (yourself, Florian, and
Jason) which were not asked to endorse the Social Contract before
joining the list.
Cheers,
Carlos.