2:41 p.m.
Hi -
What I had in mind above is an infiltration scenario whereby someone
joins, remains within the bounds of acceptable discourse as stated by
the code of conduct, never overtly rejects the values expressed in the
social contract
OK ...
yet effectively prevents the group from moving forward by derailing
discussions, questioning its foundations, and so forth. That’s
probably more or less the definition of infiltration.
If you already have notions of what directions of forward movement, or
foundational interpretations should not be questioned, please post
them for clarity. If no, then how can anyone predict what you or
someone else will label "infiltration" versus legitimate discussion?
- FChE