8:13 p.m.
Hi,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche(a)redhat.com> skribis:
> yet effectively prevents the group from moving forward by
derailing
> discussions, questioning its foundations, and so forth. That’s
> probably more or less the definition of infiltration.
If you already have notions of what directions of forward movement, or
foundational interpretations should not be questioned, please post
them for clarity. If no, then how can anyone predict what you or
someone else will label "infiltration" versus legitimate discussion?
A concrete example from IRC: for a day or so, most of the discussion was
about the code of conduct. We have two foundational documents so far:
the code of conduct and the social contract. If one joins and starts
questioning these, we won’t be making progress towards the vision
spelled out by the social contract.
I hope this clarifies what I meant.
Thanks,
Ludo’.